Post by Paddy by Grace on Mar 18, 2010 14:06:43 GMT -7
www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iG-k7q3M2jcE54i3X205jFPSmTWAD9EFBPC00
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration's fierce denunciation of Israel last
week has ignited a firestorm in Congress and among powerful pro-Israel
interest groups who say the criticism of America's top Mideast ally was
misplaced.
Since the controversy erupted, a bipartisan parade of influential lawmakers
and interest groups has taken aim at the administration's decision to
publicly condemn Israel for its announcement of new Jewish housing in east
Jerusalem while Vice President Joe Biden was visiting on Tuesday and then
openly vent bitter frustration on Friday.
With diplomats from both countries referring to the situation as a crisis,
the outpouring of anger in the United States, particularly from Capitol
Hill, comes at a difficult time for the administration, which is now trying
to win support from wary lawmakers - many of whom are up for re-election
this year - for health care reform and other domestic issues.
And those criticizing the administration's unusually blunt response to
Israel say they fear it may have distracted from and done damage to efforts
to relaunch long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
"It might be well if our friends in the administration and other places in
the United States could start refocusing our efforts on the peace process,"
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Monday.
"Now we've had our spat. We've had our family fight, and it's time for us
now to stop and get our eye back on the goal, which is the commencement of
the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks," he said.
McCain and Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., both urged the administration to
ease the tone of the dispute, which they said was demonstrating disunity and
weakness to steadfast allies of Iran.
"Let's cut the family fighting, the family feud," Lieberman said. "It's
unnecessary; it's destructive of our shared national interest. It's time to
lower voices, to get over the family feud between the U.S. and Israel. It
just doesn't serve anybody's interests but our enemies."
At least eight other lawmakers have offered similar concerns, and more are
expected to weigh in after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
upbraided Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the housing
announcement in a tense and lengthy phone call on Friday and White House
officials repeated the criticism on Sunday's talk shows.
"It's hard to see how spending a weekend condemning Israel for a zoning
decision in its capital city amounts to a positive step towards peace," said
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. He complained that the administration was
attacking a "staunch ally and friend" when it should be focusing on the
threat posed by Iran's nuclear problem.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., accused administration officials of using
"overwrought rhetoric" in suggesting that the east Jerusalem housing
announcement threatened U.S.-Israeli ties.
"The administration's strong implication that the enduring alliance between
the U.S. and Israel has been weakened, and that America's ability to broker
talks between Israel and Palestinian authorities has been undermined, is an
irresponsible overreaction," she said.
With tensions still high, former Sen. George Mitchell, the administration's
Mideast peace envoy, has delayed his departure to the region, where he is
scheduled to hold separate talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders, a
U.S. official said.
Mitchell had been scheduled to depart Washington on Monday night. He still
intends to go, but the timing is uncertain, the official said, speaking on
condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal deliberations.
The State Department on Monday said it was still awaiting a formal response
from Israel to Clinton's call and, while repeating elements of the
criticism, stressed that the U.S. commitment to Israel's security remains
"unshakable."
But spokesman P.J. Crowley also said a lot is riding on whether Israel
agrees to take steps suggested by Clinton to underscore its commitment to
the peace process and strong relations with America.
"We will evaluate the implications of this once we hear back from the
Israelis and see how they respond to our concerns," he told reporters.
Reaction to the administration was particularly intense from pro-Israel
groups.
Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League, said he was "shocked
and stunned at the administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel
on the issue of future building in Jerusalem."
"We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a
friend and ally of the United States," Foxman said.
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration's fierce denunciation of Israel last
week has ignited a firestorm in Congress and among powerful pro-Israel
interest groups who say the criticism of America's top Mideast ally was
misplaced.
Since the controversy erupted, a bipartisan parade of influential lawmakers
and interest groups has taken aim at the administration's decision to
publicly condemn Israel for its announcement of new Jewish housing in east
Jerusalem while Vice President Joe Biden was visiting on Tuesday and then
openly vent bitter frustration on Friday.
With diplomats from both countries referring to the situation as a crisis,
the outpouring of anger in the United States, particularly from Capitol
Hill, comes at a difficult time for the administration, which is now trying
to win support from wary lawmakers - many of whom are up for re-election
this year - for health care reform and other domestic issues.
And those criticizing the administration's unusually blunt response to
Israel say they fear it may have distracted from and done damage to efforts
to relaunch long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
"It might be well if our friends in the administration and other places in
the United States could start refocusing our efforts on the peace process,"
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Monday.
"Now we've had our spat. We've had our family fight, and it's time for us
now to stop and get our eye back on the goal, which is the commencement of
the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks," he said.
McCain and Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., both urged the administration to
ease the tone of the dispute, which they said was demonstrating disunity and
weakness to steadfast allies of Iran.
"Let's cut the family fighting, the family feud," Lieberman said. "It's
unnecessary; it's destructive of our shared national interest. It's time to
lower voices, to get over the family feud between the U.S. and Israel. It
just doesn't serve anybody's interests but our enemies."
At least eight other lawmakers have offered similar concerns, and more are
expected to weigh in after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
upbraided Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the housing
announcement in a tense and lengthy phone call on Friday and White House
officials repeated the criticism on Sunday's talk shows.
"It's hard to see how spending a weekend condemning Israel for a zoning
decision in its capital city amounts to a positive step towards peace," said
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. He complained that the administration was
attacking a "staunch ally and friend" when it should be focusing on the
threat posed by Iran's nuclear problem.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., accused administration officials of using
"overwrought rhetoric" in suggesting that the east Jerusalem housing
announcement threatened U.S.-Israeli ties.
"The administration's strong implication that the enduring alliance between
the U.S. and Israel has been weakened, and that America's ability to broker
talks between Israel and Palestinian authorities has been undermined, is an
irresponsible overreaction," she said.
With tensions still high, former Sen. George Mitchell, the administration's
Mideast peace envoy, has delayed his departure to the region, where he is
scheduled to hold separate talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders, a
U.S. official said.
Mitchell had been scheduled to depart Washington on Monday night. He still
intends to go, but the timing is uncertain, the official said, speaking on
condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal deliberations.
The State Department on Monday said it was still awaiting a formal response
from Israel to Clinton's call and, while repeating elements of the
criticism, stressed that the U.S. commitment to Israel's security remains
"unshakable."
But spokesman P.J. Crowley also said a lot is riding on whether Israel
agrees to take steps suggested by Clinton to underscore its commitment to
the peace process and strong relations with America.
"We will evaluate the implications of this once we hear back from the
Israelis and see how they respond to our concerns," he told reporters.
Reaction to the administration was particularly intense from pro-Israel
groups.
Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League, said he was "shocked
and stunned at the administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel
on the issue of future building in Jerusalem."
"We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a
friend and ally of the United States," Foxman said.